Kallas Remarks by Steve Kallas –
By now, you’ve read about or seen the play: Game 6, Tigers facing elimination, Top 6, Tigers up 2-1, Victor Martinez at first, Prince Fielder at third, nobody out. The Tigers have a big-time opportunity to get a few more runs and give Justin Verlander the ball for Game 7.
Jhonny Peralta hits a hard ground ball to second base. Dustin Pedroia fields the ball and starts to throw home as Fielder is running on contact. But Pedroia sees Martinez running toward him and Fielder stops about halfway down the line. So Pedroia tags Martinez (who goes on to the infield grass trying to avoid the tag) and then throws home. Catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia runs Fielder back towards third and tags him out as he tries to avoid the tag.
HOW DID TIM McCARVER ANALYZE THE PLAY?
Well, here’s exactly what he said:
That’s terrible baserunning by Prince Fielder. He’s [Fielder gotta make Pedroia come home with the ball before he [Pedroia} can tag Martinez between first and second. This plays right into Pedroia’s hand.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen this, Joe. Pedroia fakes home and now goes home. They get Fielder in a rundown and Saltalamacchia finally makes the tag. Fielder has gotta come home, prevent the tag between first and second, but he stopped between first and second (McCarver misspoke the prior three words), between home and third.
You can’t make that mistake. Pedroia made a brilliant play the double play.
WHAT DID TIM McCARVER MISS?
Well, that’s easy. While Fielder made a terrible baserunning mistake (both he and manager Jim Leyland said he was supposed to go on contact) by not continuing home once he left on contact, Victor Martinez made a gigantic baserunning mistake that seems to have been missed by everybody.
On a ground ball to second, especially in a situation with runners on first and third, the runner leaving first has to immediately make a judgment. In this particular situation, Martinez should have simply stopped after one or two strides. In other words, Martinez (not Fielder) gave Pedroia the chance to make this improbable double play. If Martinez isn’t near Pedroia (and, again, he certainly didn’t have to be), Pedroia probably throws home, probably gets Fielder and then the Tigers have first and second with one out (in other words, a chance to still score more runs).
If Pedroia makes a mistake (unlikely) and doesn’t throw home, allowing Fielder to score, he probably tags Martinez (after he runs the 10 feet or so separation there should have been between Pedroia and Martinez) and then flips to first to get the double play. In that case, Detroit is up 3-1 with two out and nobody on.
This is on Victor Martinez as much or more than on Fielder because, again, the double play by tagging Martinez and throwing home is IMPOSSIBLE if Victor Martinez isn’t near Pedroia. This mistake is what allowed Pedroia to make the brilliant double play.
BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE, AS McCARVER TOTALLY GOT THIS WRONG
About two minutes later, almost as an afterthought, Tim McCarver made this startling statement about the amazing double play after a comment by Joe Buck:
Yeah and the middle infielders were playing at double play depth, not in.
Well, not exactly.
There are three (not two) ways to play the infield in this type of situation. First, you can play the infield in to have the best chance to cut the run off at the plate (or make the runner stay at third). Clearly the Red Sox did not do that (nor did they want to as, obviously, it’s easier to get a base hit with the infield in).
Second, they could play the infield back, at double play depth, as McCarver mistakenly said. In that situation, you essentially concede the run to turn two. But, of course, the Red Sox didn’t want to concede a run already down in a huge game in the sixth inning.
The third way to play the infield, and the way that the Red Sox DID play, is to play the middle infielders “half way,” that is, not all the way up and not all the way back. Both Pedroia and shortstop Stephen Drew were well in front of the back of the infield dirt (or the outfield grass, whichever you prefer). In that case, when Pedroia fields the hard grounder by Peralta (and then, in his judgment, he can come home and stop the run), he is virtually in the base line between first and second and can tag out Martinez running from first ONLY IF MARTINEZ MAKES THE BLUNDER OF RUNNING TOWARDS PEDROIA.
Which, of course, Martinez did.
The position of the middle infielders before the ball is hit is readily apparent from the wide-screen shot from behind home plate that was shown on the replay. The reason you play your middle infielders “half way” (and this has been done forever) is for precisely what happened: the batter hits a very hard ball right at the second baseman or shortstop.
That’s exactly what happened and both Martinez AND Fielder had to make base running blunders to have this amazing double play happen.
And they both did.
ONE FINAL THING ON THE BASEBALL BRILLIANCE OF DUSTIN PEDROIA MISSED BY THE “EXPERTS”
Baseball is a very nuanced game, very interesting, often fascinating. Everyone understands how intelligent and quick-thinking a player Dustin Pedroia is based on the double play he pulled off.
But if you want to understand brilliance on top of brilliance, watch the play again. After Pedroia throws home and Jerrod Saltalamacchia starts to run Prince Fielder back towards third, somebody (usually the pitcher in this situation) has to run home and cover home plate in case the rundown continues.
Who is covering home as Saltalamacchia runs Fielder back to third?
Dustin Pedroia, that’s who. Brilliance on top of brilliance in an amazing baseball play.
Watch the replay and draw your own conclusions with your own eyes. There’s plenty to see. You can learn a lot about baseball and the nuances of baseball by watching this play.
© Copyright 2013 by Steve Kallas. All rights reserved.