PROFESSIONAL BOWLERS ASSOCIATION IS RIGHT: EARL ANTHONY #1

                               Kallas Remarks by Steve Kallas

    

The PBA recently announced the top 50 bowlers of the 50 years of the PBA.  There was much dispute, discussion and anticipation about who would be #1 and who would be #2.  The contestants, of course, were Earl Anthony and Walter Ray Williams, Jr.

    

Thankfully, the experts got it right and named Earl Anthony the greatest bowler of the last 50 years.

     

Anthony, the smooth left-hander, had plenty of firsts and finished first plenty of times.  He was the first bowler to reach $1 million in earnings.  He was the PBA Player of the Year six times, a stunning accomplishment.  He won the George Young High Average Award five times.  And, as stated, he finished first 43 times, including a record 10 “majors” (that dispute over whether or not the two USBC Masters he won were “majors” or “titles” disappeared in the last year or so).  Cool as they come and as smooth as a bowler can be, Anthony dominated the tour and amassed his stunning accomplishments in only 14 years.  He is a member of both the PBA Hall of Fame and the USBC Hall of Fame. 

    

Hall of Famer Williams, of course, has surpassed many of Anthony’s records.  He is the first player to reach $4 million in earnings and he has now won a record 45 titles, seven of which are majors.  He has now won a title in 16 consecutive years, breaking the long-standing record of (you guessed it) Earl Anthony (15 consecutive years).  He is right-handed, which makes it more difficult in the eyes of most to win titles.  He also has been named PBA Player of the Year six times.  And his career is still stunningly successful.

      

CONTROVERSY?

      

Interestingly, on the ESPN telecast when the decision was announced, two experts took a middle ground despite believing Walter Ray is the better bowler.  Randy Pedersen (#35 on the list), for example, has stated numerous times on national TV over the last few years that we were “looking at the greatest bowler ever” when watching Walter Ray.  On the day of the announcement, however, he took a more politically correct stance, not saying that he thought the experts were wrong.

    

Even fan favorite Bo Burton (#15 on the list), who seemed to tell Pete Dougherty of TimesUnion.com just a few months ago that he thought Walter Ray was the best, simply said, on national TV, that maybe they will take another vote in five or ten years and the result might be different.

    

It might be too much to ask for a little controversy.

    

Writer Pete Dougherty, who did have a vote, voted for Earl Anthony and presented an interesting stat:  Earl Anthony won a staggering 11.1% of the tournaments he entered while Walter Ray was a distant second, having won 6.4% of his tournaments.

        

HERE’S WHY IT’S AN ESPECIALLY GOOD DECISION

       

In the world of sports that we live in today (you know, nothing happened in the history of sports before 1979), it’s usually the latest who is viewed to be the greatest.  For example, when ESPN came out with its Top 50 athletes of the 20th Century, they somehow voted Michael Jordan #1.  While there’s no chance that Jordan is the greatest athlete ever (Jim Thorpe, Jim Brown and Jackie Robinson were certainly better “athletes” than Jordan), there’s a real question as to whether Jordan is even the greatest basketball player ever (Wilt, Russell, Oscar – pick any one and you might be right).  And if you had to pick the greatest player in a team sport (as opposed to the greatest athlete), well, the first three guys on that list would be named Babe Ruth.

    

But I digress.  In the world of today, it was excellent to see someone recognized from yesterday.

       

WHAT DOES WALTER RAY THINK?

        

Thankfully, Walter Ray totally gets it.  He was widely-quoted as saying: “I feel Earl’s record is better than mine because it was more condensed.  Earl bowled 14 years and 400 or so events.  I’ve bowled well over 600 by now, maybe 700.  Some people will argue Earl’s era was tougher, but others will argue my era was tougher.  The reality is, people threw the ball differently in each era.  That’s the way the game is played.”

    

Walter Ray continued: “I’m very pleased to be No. 2.  If Dick Weber would have had 45 titles at the time Earl was still bowling, he probably would have kept on bowling because he would have wanted someone to chase.  As it was, he retired because no one had close to the number of titles he had.  He didn’t have anything to shoot for.”

    

Amen to that.

    

So there you have it.  The #2 bowler agreeing with the selection of the #1 bowler.  That kind of class rarely exists today.

         

© Copyright 2008 by Steve Kallas.  All rights reserved.

Advertisements

3 responses to “PROFESSIONAL BOWLERS ASSOCIATION IS RIGHT: EARL ANTHONY #1

  1. I agree that Earl was the best. He didn’t bowl with these “exotic” balls. He bowled with hard rubber and plastic. You had to be a bowler then. Walter Ray is good but he is the beneficiary of todays equiptment. Just my opinion..

  2. I have to agree with Walter Ray because I watched them both bowl for about 40 years. I also bowled a league with Walter Ray in Pomona, California.
    They are two different bowlers – one left hand and one right hand that bowls like he pitched horse shoes and does a awesome job at both sports. But, they bowled at different times and they both are the greatest in their own right.

    I feel Earl is the best bowler because of the time in which he bowled and the conditions were so different than when Walter Ray hit the circuit so to say.

    I bowled at the same time and even when bowling with Walter Ray, lane conditions started changing and equipment became better, so scores were higher because of better conditions. Pins were weighted slightly different with not so much of a void area and that contributed to better scores.

    Again, I think they both were great in their own way.

    Kathy Williams

  3. Walter has hit the proverbial nail right square on the head. Earl’s titles were won over a much shorter period. If Earl had decided to grind it out until he was approaching 50 years old as WRW has done you’re going to tell me EA would not have surpassed 50 titles easily? As it was he came bcak from a heart attack and picked right up where he left off. Then retired and when some loudmouth PBA’er said the “’80’s” was going to be his “bowler of the year” decade, Earl laced up the bowling shoes again and proceeded to dominate the game again. Then re-retired and nine months later bowled in the then ABC Masters and won it going away having barely picked up a bowling ball in the previous nine months!!! WRW is a great bowler but Earl is the best of all time! And Bo & Randy need to get their heads outta the sand. Cause WRW could bowl for another 10 years and get to 55 titles and Earl’s accomplishments would still be greater! And I doubt WRW will be on the PBA tour at almost 60.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s